<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechForceOne &#187; YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techforceone.com/category/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techforceone.com</link>
	<description>For developers, by developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive Download vs Streaming</title>
		<link>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/06/progressive-download-vs-streaming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/06/progressive-download-vs-streaming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kumar Bhogaraju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Media Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforceone.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When delivering video on the web, you probably would have wondered whether to use a streaming server or not. There are quite a few articles on the web and they are very useful. I just wanted to summarize my experience on this here. Progressive Download: This is a better solution when your clips are small, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/06/progressive-download-vs-streaming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online advertisement revenue is not directly proportional to website traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/04/online-advertisement-revenue-is-not-directly-proportional-to-website-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/04/online-advertisement-revenue-is-not-directly-proportional-to-website-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kumar Bhogaraju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforceone.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a myth amongst bloggers and other website owners that the more traffic they generate, the more ad revenue they make. 5 years back, probably, it was believable. But if we look at some of the heavy weights, like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, none of them are profitable yet. While Twitter and Facebook are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/04/online-advertisement-revenue-is-not-directly-proportional-to-website-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
