<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechForceOne &#187; Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techforceone.com/tag/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techforceone.com</link>
	<description>For developers, by developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ext4 file system &#8211; Intro and Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/03/ext4-file-system-intro-and-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/03/ext4-file-system-intro-and-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kumar Bhogaraju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforceone.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did not use the minixFS, but I did get a chance to use all other Linux file systems as they evolved. With ext4 without the experimental tag, we can see it as the default linux file system in many distros before the end of the year. Here is an interesting article from Linux Magazine, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/03/ext4-file-system-intro-and-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft and Red Hat virtualization deal</title>
		<link>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/02/microsoft-and-red-hat-virtualization-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/02/microsoft-and-red-hat-virtualization-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kumar Bhogaraju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforceone.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than two years back, Microsoft claimed that software like Linux, violates its patents. You can read all about that here. But lately, Microsoft is changing its approach towards the Open Source community. I recently posted about Project Stonehenge here. Now, Microsoft and Red Hat signed agreements to test and validate server operating systems running [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techforceone.com/2009/02/microsoft-and-red-hat-virtualization-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
